I read your article with interest. However, it is disappointing and absurd that you have alluded to people accusing “the US Government” of orchestrating 9/11. The US Government comprises a huge and diverse network of agencies and personnel, 10s of thousands of employees, working for the US Postal Service to the USGS, NASA to NOAA, the State Department, the Justice Department…. and dozens more.

However, the most likely scenario as regards the identities of those who planned and executed 9/11 – would most likely be a very small group of people in positions of highly privileged access as regards security clearance and ability to make decisions and give orders. The key to the success of 9/11, was the need to *prevent the US military from reacting in the normal, time honored fashion*, using a set of protocols and procedures which have worked highly efficiently, for decades.

On June 1, 2001, the following, incredible “blunder” happened :

Just two short months prior to 9/11, then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld oversaw a significant change to DoD procedures for dealing with hijacked aircraft, making it the personal responsibility of the Defense Secretary to issue intercept orders.

Commanders in the field were stripped of all authority to act.

The document, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A (dated 1 June 2001) was issued for the purpose of providing “guidance to the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), National Military Command Center (NMCC), and operational commanders in the event of an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or request for destruction of derelict airborne objects.”

The new instruction, signed by S.A. Fry (Vice Admiral, US Navy and Director, Joint Staff) superseded previous procedures. This document states that “In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses as authorized by reference d, forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval.”

This is incredible. In other words, the scramble operating procedures/protocols which had worked 100% successfully for decades to deal with rogue airplanes were scrapped by Rumsfeld, and replaced with a protocol which failed *spectacularly* on September 11, 2001. Had the original procedures been left in place, the terrorists’ mission would have failed: NOT ONE of those hijacked planes would have made it anywhere near their targets, and the WTC would still be standing today. The 2,947 who died on the day, the 974 who have died from sicknesses contracted by inhalation of the toxic dust, 5500 US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan who were killed in an illegal war would still be alive, and the US economy would be $1.5 Trillion better off.

Even more incredibly, the original scramble procedures were reinstated on September 12, 2001.
Rumsfeld’s bizarre action was instrumental in allowing the 9/11 plot to succeed. Now why he did this, and why not a word was mentioned in the media, and not a single question in Congress….. is about the most extraordinary piece of treachery in US history.

And I haven’t even started on the question of “who bypassed security at the WTC to rig the buildings with nano-thermite, a composite nanoparticulate high explosive-incendiary – only manufactured in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and accessible to people with high security clearances.

James Kust – please open your mind – the conspiracy theory stuff has been the crazy, single sourced, baseless, no-proof baloney about 19 hijackers and a guy in a cave….

Mr. Kust:
after introducing this “movement” as one making claims of “inside job… orchestrated by our government” you qualify your references to these and “other claims” with the phrase “depending who you ask”.

You do not make reference to whom these and other claims depend upon, but, by lumping Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth with a jumble of “dependings” and “other claims” you don’t do justice to what AE911truth.org propounds in any way.

Though you quote their mission is to “research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation” you distort what they actually claim by saying you’re “vehemently opposed to everything” for which they stand; by more-than-strong implication, you claim they impute the government would stoop so low to cause the deaths of 9/11.

They do no such thing.

Their references to government and statements are to establish the apparently false, contradictory and/or clear impossibility of the government’s so-far unsubstantiated theory of the destruction of the towers and WTC – with substantive evidence of their own.

They in no way theorize, as this piece claims from ill-researched inferences and apparently uninformed knee-jerk reaction to the mere use of “9/11” and “Truth” in the same phrase, the government “orchestrated” or was directly involved. They refuse to “theorize”; they ask questions, present the contradictions, and make the case for actual investigation into the destruction.

You contradict yourself again if we can compare your own statement, “It’s offensive to every family member and friend of those who lost their lives that day”, to what we can read prior to your quote from their website: “Our work at AE911Truth is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events.”

Another fact to consider: the families themselves started the 9/11 Truth movement and called the government’s *entire* theory into doubt, not just the fall of the buildings, which is something AE911truth.org is unwilling to do themselves without evidentiary basis. Their work is simply to support the victims’ friends and family members own search for the truth – through their evidence and the laws of physics.

Despite your contradictory, unsubstantiated and obfuscatory statements – or probably because of them – you converge into a poetic juxtaposition of “being at Ground Zero” this year and naive Patriotism to cover your lack of research and ability to distinguish between “truthers” and an association of science-based sceptics.

Your “opinion” in some way crystallizes many things which “changed forever” on Sept. 11, 2001.

Beyond a moment of sadness mixed with brief, undeserved patriotic absolution, it demonstrates we don’t need goons dressed as soldiers and police using bullets and batons to censor and silence the people, all we need is a press and media who don’t do justice to the principles of journalism.

ref.: http://www.ae911truth.org/

The fact that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt at this point. I am heartened at the comments here, which are pretty much unanimously in favor of 9/11 truth. This was a staged, fake “terror” attack known as a false flag operation. Kennedy was killed one year after rejecting the now declassified “Operation Northwoods” which proposed staging fake “attacks” and blaming it on Castro. These propositions included fake plane passengers and remote controlled planes. Yes, the technology for that was there in 1961. There is plenty of evidence that the Pentagon event on 9/11 was just as fake/staged as the demolition of the WTC. Watch the video National Security Alert:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

or if you would like the 4 minute Readers’ Digest version, Canadian journalist, media critic and 9/11 documentary maker Barrie Zwicker sums it up perfectly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu5wzJtSMhc

Would one consider offensive the reopening of a murder case if new evidence pointed to another suspect? Wouldn’t the victim’s family prefer knowing the right person was behind bars rather than just be content with whomever was doing the time? If there was any doubt, wouldn’t they at least want to have it investigated?

It was once deemed offensive to believe that the earth revolved around the sun. Thankfully, scientific minds prevailed… just as they should now.

The entire official 9/11 story is virtually an unproven allegation – from the alleged acts of the accused, to how the planes were reportedly controlled, to how the buildings actually fell. And the evidence used to support major aspects of the official 9/11 story has been proven by research to be suspect.

Just because the TV says without end, that 9/11 happened as advertised, does not make it so.

“…faith in those who lead them.”

Ok, you have a fundamental flaw in your philosophy on how this country is run. They are our servants, not our ‘leaders’! Their ONLY job is to protect our liberty. Period.

“…offensive to the victims.”

That is just a lie.

Jet fuel doesn’t vaporize steel.
Fires don’t pulverize steel and reinforced concrete.
One thing you’re correct about is ‘our government’ didn’t do this horrific act of murder and terror. But they certainly covered for those who did. 9/11 would have never happened, it would have been thwarted before it began if not for rogue elements in high places within our government, military, pentagon, intelligence, and law enforcement. Plus a fully obedient media (See: Mike Rivero’s post regarding BBC and Tower 7!).

But don’t take my word for it, let’s hear what others have to say:

“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.” ~Osama bin Laden

“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. ” ~Osama bin Laden Oct.2001

“America’s greatest enemy – radical Islam – never existed: neither when Bin Laden was alive, nor now.” ~ Michael Scheuer, Chief of the CIA’s ‘Bin Laden unit’, Author, Historian

“In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper — either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere — that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot.” ~FBI Director Robert Muller April 19, 2002

For people who just can’t believe our government would purposely kill 3000 people. Our government has purposely built more than 50 thousand thermonuclear bombs and missiles with which to kill all seven billion people on Earth 10 times over, deliberately and ruthlessly without a shred of remorse, and has heavily trained thousands of technicians and pilots and silo staff to deliver those 50 thousand thermonuclear bombs to target with no hesitation when the button is pushed and the secret launch codes delivered. THAT is reality. Compared to that, killing 3000 people and blowing up 3 skyscrapers is a walk in the park.

James, with respect, if you are ever called for jury service in a criminal trial have yourself excused. You appear to be lacking the necessary intellect and objectivity and capacity to examine scientific expert evidence and surrounding circumstantial material. The courts and legal fraternity would be well advised to
note the present incapacity. I do hope that you will rectify your problem/s. Perhaps you could start by firstly acknowedgeing the problem then noting the comments above.
To start you off with a bit of fun search the Corbett report; A 911
conspiracy theory. Please note the comment by Mike Rivero who has the whatreallyhappened.com website, his 911 material is illuminating. (note that ‘really’ in the title has two ‘l’s.)
Cheers from way South of the US.

I have studied 911 for several years. When you study something for more than four years in collage you may get a degree, study what the government is hiding and what it has done, and you get the third degree.
From media gatekeepers like yourself who are either paid off or claiming your continued ignorance is out of respect for the families.
It wasn’t as the gov said it was they lied about pretty much everything about 911, if you took the time to research 91 properly the very fact that the US GOV covered it up should cause you to rethink your position on “911 truth”.
because guess what family members of victims have been lied to just like you.

So heres what you do, you shut up and listen to what the firefighters, police and regular people who were there at the wtc said about 911. Then compare that to what the gov said about 911.

Not one comment supportive of the article! LOL!!!!
KUDOS AMERICA, WELL DONE!

My my how the lanscape has changed.
It must make them nervous as they consider killing Ron Paul…

if the US government is telling the truth about 3 skyscrapers collapsing due to fires on 9/11, why aren’t all demolition companies around the world out of business?

I can’t say what happened on 9/11, and unless you were personally involved in the plot, or personally investigated it, you can’t either.

What I can say is that the men who chaired our nation’s investigation into what happened had previously had been reported by the AP to have breakfasted with the man the FBI called “The 9/11 Money Man” on that fateful morning. Curiously, the Senate committee’s extensive report on this matter did NOT EVEN mention this well documented meeting (the man had been the head of the Paki ISI until he vanished) and concluded that the source of the funding was unimportant because it was “so small”.

One of those chairmen went on to head the CIA under Bush II.

It is obvious to me that our investigations into 9/11 were so seriously flawed that no reasonable individual can accept them as being done in “good faith”. Since the story changed (all of the reports that day referenced bombs and explosions and even a moving van full of explosives driven by Israeli spies)… well you can understand why those of us who won’t drink the CIA’s Kool-aid have some VERY serious questions about this matter and the intentions of our intelligence agencies.

Not one single voice raised in support of the Justin Beiber of journalism? How truly wonderful!

James Kust of the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire is Misinformed

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2012/05/james-kust-of-university-of.html

Trying to uncover the truth is always offensive, to the liars and their stooges.

“Ten years later, we’re still trying to understand what happened that day. And from this lack of understanding comes confusion.”

Exactly. Even members of the 9/11 Commission itself admit that the investigation was a sham. Many so-called “Truthers” simply want to know what happened through a fair, impartial, comprehensive investigation.

The evidence we have now may not tell us what happened that tragic day. But it does prove without a shadow of a doubt that our government has lied to us. It’s also clear beyond doubt that 9/11 was used to justify the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Wanting to finally get to the bottom and know the truth about this tragedy in no way disrespects the dead and their families. On the contrary. Burying our heads in the sand and pretending the truth doesn’t really matter is what is truly disrespectful.

“To imply that our government would stoop so low, that our leaders are so driven by greed that 2,996 deaths are simply collateral damage can only be described as offensive.

It’s offensive to every family member and friend of those who lost their lives that day, and it’s offensive to Americans who, naively or not, exercise a degree of faith in those who lead them.”

Bill Doyle estimated in 2006 that half of the 7,000 members of his email communication network for 9/11 families thought the government was complicit in the attacks.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060709040719187

More “offended 9/11 family members” support ae911truth!

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161621.0

Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

We, the undersigned Families, First Responders and Survivors of September 11 raise our voice with those from across our country and around the world in support of NYC CAN and the establishment of an independent, impartial subpoena powered investigation into the events surrounding the September 11 attacks on our nation.

http://nyccan.org/signatories.php

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report

http://stj911.org/press_releases/NIST.html

Bryan Hunt, FDNY, retired 8-15 Years
“I retired from FDNY in 1998. I knew many of the guys who died in the WTC collapses. May they rest in peace. I’ve read tons of information re. the deaths of my brothers on 9/11. I’ve watched the videos, listened to the rantings on both sides. It wasn’t until 2006 that I began questioning the “official story” and did my own research. There is bad info on both sides, but I’ve concluded that the “official story” doesn’t add up. It sounds like a whitewash. The 9/11 Commission didn’t investigate anything–they just took statements. We need a real, independent investigation, with supeona powers. If the “offical” version is correct, so be it. And if heads are going to roll at any level of the government or military, so be it. Let’s do it, and let’s not be afraid of the truth. The brothers deserve that much.”

http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=469

As a history teacher, I respectfully remind James Kust and readers that the US has indeed stooped so low many times in history to engage in lie-began wars to control resources and land. Abraham Lincoln as a freshman member of Congress had the intellectual integrity and moral courage to stand on the House floor and report that the US war on Mexico was in obvious violation of the Adams-Onis treaty that forever promised land ownership to Mexico for lands today in the SW US, and that this treaty proved the US President lied by 400 miles when he said Mexico invaded the US with “American blood shed on American soil.” The US had invaded Mexico by 400 miles according to the treaty, that Article 6 of the US Constitution states is US Supreme Law.

That’s just one example; here are about a dozen more: http://www.examiner.com/article/occupy-this-us-history-exposes-the-1-s-crimes-then-and-now-1-of-6

James Kust and readers should also understand war law, the legal victory all our families sacrificed through two world wars to win for us: no nation can use their military to attack unless another nation’s government attacks. The US wars are Orwellian unlawful, kill millions and cost US taxpayers trillions. Here’s that documentation: http://www.examiner.com/article/how-a-government-teacher-easily-proves-occupy-s-claim-of-us-war-crimes

So, yes, the US has and is stooping to murder on a colossal scale.

Professional academics demand that facts speak for themselves; this is the education stand since The Enlightenment, and never to believe government wouldn’t harm people! History shows us that governments have continually lied to harm people, usually for wars.

We all know that.

It is apparent that the ones trying to dissuade the ever growing population becoming aware of that which is obvious, controlled demolitions, are paying publications like this in an attempt to accomplish it. Anyone with a brain can see it, and genuine science confirms it that the government is lying.

How is starting a war based on lies bringing hundreds of thousands of innocent people to an untimely death showing any kind of regard for humanity?

This article disgusts me, and many others as well.

Critical independent thinkers don’t shut their selves off from ideas they find threatening.

I encourage you to start using independent thinking and the application of critical analysis to come to the “best” answer, (most defensible answer supported by the evidence and facts), instead of defending your position with an appeal to emotion rather than science.

Critical thinkers are open to having their cherished beliefs challenged, and must learn how to “defend” their views based on evidence and logic, NOT with emotions or by merely proclaiming that your views are “valid” because to think otherwise “is offensive” or by answering questions with other questions like; “how our government could be so evil”.

Your use of rationalizations and excuses in an attempt to dismiss the facts supported by the overwhelming evidence is a prime example of a simple minded anti-intellectual controlled by cognitive dissonance.

By now I would expect you should be fully aware that Cognitive dissonance happens when a closed minded individual learns the observable facts discovered through research and they immediately begin to bring up rationalizations and excuses in order to dismiss the significance of the information rather than reflect on or have a stimulating discussion regarding the implications of what the new information they have learned could mean.

The reason why some people have a hard time excepting new information and its implications is because some people have so much at stake in their beliefs they can’t comfortably learn any new information that might challenge those beliefs, so rather than seeking to educate themselves through stimulating conversations or research regarding such new information or differing opinions, they will do everything possible to remain ignorant and avoid hearing any course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood of those differing opinions with facts.

If there is a lot of built up psychological stake in a certain position or attitude and a piece of solid evidence comes in which conflicts with that position, it may be easier, psychologically, to dismiss the new information than alter the existing structure, belief/reality. This is called Cognitive dissonance.

You can imagine how ingrained psychological structures can be when a person is raised within a certain country, system, or reality. Growing up in the US, or any culture, for that matter, you will absorb an overwhelming number of messages about what is true, what is possible, and what is important.

Many of these messages are absorbed subconsciously and become part of the basic structure of our reality. Therefore People are biased to think of the system and or reality they have been raised in and taught by is correct, despite any contrary evidence.

You can often witness cognitive dissonance in action as people, despite the overwhelming evidence you have shown or presented to them, will try to avoid the psychological turmoil of facing the very disturbing implications of the truth.

Because the truth can sometimes shatter what a person believes and the reality they thought they knew some people subconsciously protect their beliefs/reality with willful ignorance rather than except the truth and its implications.

A person’s subconscious will protect their fragile beliefs from being exposed to any new facts that might jeopardize their reality, causing their heart rate to increase and their mood to become agitated, any time the slightest mention of a specific subject or fact that exposes the person to possibly new information that might challenge their fragile belief/reality. This is why there are topics that some people are too uncomfortable discussing because their subconscious is protecting their fragile beliefs.

According to your own writing you are too offended and therefore to biased and unable to apply independent thinking and the application of critical analysis on the subject of 9/11.

Joseph Goebbels said; “…there was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the stronger, ‘and this will always be the man in the street.’ Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology… Hatred and contempt must be directed at particular individuals.”
All you have to do is tell the citizens they are being attacked, and denounce the intellectuals for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.

Dear Mr. James Kust,

I appreciate the manner in which you conveyed your message. The University of Waterloo, which is the equivalent of MIT in Canada, also approved years ago the “The University of Waterloo 9/11 Research Group”. Website: http://uwaterloo911.wordpress.com/

The group organized over a dozen presentations with academics that the general public found to be highly informative and important. The presentations were based on papers that were published in peer-reviewed papers in journals.

I am directing a film entitled “9/11 in Academic Community” and it won an award at the University of Toronto Film Fest. I hope to share the documentary with Mr. Kust.

Mr. Kust, respect can best be shown to the dead and to their survivors by demanding full and honest investigations. The 9/11 widows gave 300 questions to the 9/11 Commission, and were told that these would serve as a road map for the investigation. When the report was issued, they checked and found that only 27 of their questions had been adequately answered.
http://www.justicefor911.org/Appendix4_FSCQuestionRatings_111904.php

Dear Idealist,
Your attack and Insults towards the 9-11 Truth movement and the new, officially sanctioned University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire, on-campus 9-11 Studies student-organization, as confused and misinformed, is weak journalism – if it’s journalism at all. I can say with all confidence, based on your article, that anyone in the 9-11 Truth movement, even if for just one day, is more informed in regards to the attacks on 9-11 than you. By the end of these comments we will know who is the confused-one.

I commend the courageous students of the new on-campus 9-11 studies student-organization. Your search for the truth is a bold action not often enough seen in college students today. I further commend you for your ability to think for yourself, to apply critical-thinking, and to come to your own conclusions. I encourage you not to let the weak-minded discourage you.

When I say the “weak-minded,” I am referring to those persons un-educated in regards to the 9-11 Truth movements evidence, beliefs and ideas, or those who will attack the 9-11 Truth movement out-of-hand without applying critical-thought to our evidence or the events at the World Trade Center on 9-11. I am referring as well, to those among you who have not looked at the evidence of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9-11, but have formed a conclusion based on what they are told to believe, blindly following the powers-that-be. It is a critical-thinking problem on their part.

Your arrogant and ignorant contemporaries, who have not looked at the evidence of the WTC tower implosions by controlled demolition, will mock you and call you a misinformed and confused 9-11 “truther”. I too am a “9-11 truther”. If we weren’t 9-11 truthers – well, then we’d be 9-11 liars, wouldn’t we? In actuality, that’s what our detractors are; liars – whether know it or not.

These unquestioning baby-fascists feel like they are knowledgeable enough to spew the official party-line, but are too lazy-minded to ever look at a shred of evidence, putting no critical thought to the events of 9-11. They are mentally lazy and easily swayed by propaganda. They are the true enemies of freedom and liberty, along with the authoritarian fascist-elite (.01 of the 1%er’s) who spread the lies about the events of 9-11.

Breaking the will of the people in their search for the truth is the chief objective of the authoritarian-elite and their minions, who blindly accept their mission to spread the lies, not knowing what they are doing. These minions are in a zombie-type state of mind repeating what they hear from others, unable to form their own conclusions.

Since 9-11, the authoritarian elite have attacked the will of the American people with a fascist-ferocity of a daily propaganda-missile to the brain through the complicit mainstream media, as well as assaulting our freedom and liberty via the patriot act.

The modern media is not journalism (neither is the student-author’s article, which is nothing more than a regurgitation of talking points that he heard someone else say). It is a violent assault on the mind. It is more deadly than a gulag. No need for imprisonment in a gulag for re-education, you are a prisoner in all your life, chained to your multimedia devices that spoon-feed you the dis-information of the fascist regime. The disinformation spewed by mainstream media is a violent assault directed at the defenseless psyche of the weak-minded viewer and reader.

Truthers, the arrogant and ignorant among your contemporaries, who speak against your courageous search for the truth, will one day fit nicely with these fascists. Try to educate them to save themselves from themselves and to stop them from joining the dis-information war. There is an info-war going on. The war is for total ownership of your mind. Learn more at:

http://www.infowars.com
http://www.prisonplanet.tv

Under the stress of psychological warfare, individuals can do on or the other; submit and accept the government’s version of reality, or they fiercely resist with great mental force. This is the history of the struggle against tyranny.

Accepting the official version of the 9-11 events without critical thought or investigation of the evidence is an admission of mental submission – the acceptance of their weak mind. Only mental resistance can deny the government the power to enslave a mind.

Engaging in the mental resistance against the psychological machinery of totalitarian, fascist state-power is crucial if we want to restore our freedom, our liberty, the Bill of Rights and the rule of law of the constitution that has been stolen from us through the Patriot Act.

Make no mistake – the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA) effectively suspends habeas corpus and according to the NDAA the government can kill you without a trial. The fascist regime has declared the U.S. as a battlefield in the pseudo-war against terror making what’s left of the Bill of Rights worthless.

The fascists are waiting for a civil emergency (likely, another false-flag) to announce the fact that we are under martial-law. We’ve been under martial-law since 9-11. They haven’t said so, but the Patriot Act makes it so and the NDAA takes away any doubt.

The danger is not in telling the truth and being mocked by the envious arrogant and ignorant, or even silenced by the thought police. The danger is in believing the lies, thus helping the fascists to enslave the truth-seekers and the truth speakers. In the battle between lies and death – versus – truth and life, the only sane choice is to be on the side of truth and life. And guess what? Truth has always won throughout the history of man-kind. That’s how we have survived this long. That’s why seeking and finding the truth is paramount if you want to live a long, happy, prosperous life filled with freedom and liberty.

When one recognizes that they are being lied to about who are the true perpetrators of a crime against them, one need only look at who benefited most from the crime to find the truth. So, who benefited from the following 9-11 facts?

The Patriot Act: The fascist regime.

The Afghanistan and Iraq wars: for the benefit of those in the military industrial-complex who profit from perpetual war or the “forever war” as they call the pseudo war-on-terror. This is now goes on forever; a lucrative proposition for these war-mongers.

The obsolete and aged WTC towers: have been razed for the owners who were facing a multi-million dollar price tag to eliminate the asbestos problem in the towers or close them down, or face potential financially devastating lawsuits.

The owners of the WTC towers – in particular building number 7: who, in the months before 9-11 insured the buildings against terrorism and received multimillion dollar insurance settlements after 9-11.

Those who knew ahead of time and profited by shorting airline stock: The Justice Department has been asked to track these people, a doable task, but the powers-that-be refuse. Apparently, AG Holder is too busy fast and furiously selling guns to drug gangs in Mexico.

These few examples of the beneficiaries of 9-11 are all indisputable fact. The only winners from the 9-11 attacks it seems are the elite insiders. Al Qaeda or the Taliban sure didn’t benefit. They got cruise missiles and bunker- buster shoved-up their keisters. What does that tell you?

The author of the article that I’m responding to writes:

“….to imply that our government would stoop so low, that our leaders are so driven by greed (And power – me) that 2,996 deaths are simply collateral damage can only be described as offensive.” (Give me a break. How naively uniformed can a want-to-be journalist be)

It is sad that this, I assume a want-to-be journalist, is not willing to do the work to find out just how easily the ruling elite are willing to sacrifice your life or the life of many. Apparently, the author has not looked at the lies behind the Tonken Gulf Resolution that justified the escalation of the Viet Nam war and killed 50,000 boys and men.

In 1964, the Tonken Golf Resolution was a false-flag operation perpetrated by the Johnson administration that created the lie that an American PT boat was attacked by the Vietnamese. This lie was used to escalate the war. A war the American people did not want, so they had to create a false-flag to convince America to go to war in Viet Nam. (Hum, I wonder if the American people would have supported the Iraq and Afghanistan wars without 9-11. Very interesting – what do you think?) The Tonken Gulf lie cost 50,000 American boys and men their lives. This false-flag lie is a criminal act perpetrated by the U.S. government on its own citizens costing 50,000 innocent lives. This is not someone’s interpretation of events. This is agreed upon, by historians of all world-views, as historical fact.

In that same war, the CIA waged an illegal clandestine war in Cambodia murdering thousands – perhaps 10’s of thousands. Read the Pentagon Papers for the truth.

How about the million-plus Iraqi’s killed in “the lies-about-WMD’s” war in Iraq, and what was it, 6 or 8 thousand U.S. boys and men? For what purpose – WAR PROFITS AND EMPIRE AMBITIONS – nothing else. These were wars of choice not necessity that would not have happened if not for 9-11. The American people would not have supported the wars “without a new pearl harbor” (In “quotes” from the Project for a New American Century [PNAC]; principles- Cheney – Rumsfeld – Pearl – Wolfowitz – et al neo-cons.

So, I don’t want to hear about your naive – more likely your pseudo-feelings of being offended by 9-11 truth presenting clear and convincing evidence that rouge-elements within our government murdered nearly 3000 people on 9-11.

Want to see more about how “low” these fascists have “stooped.” Visit this website:

http://www.apk2000.dk/netavisen/artikler/global_debat/2002-1126_us_imp_basic_stats.htm

For an explanation of the physics at work at the WTC towers on 9-11, visit:

http://physics911.net/

Members of the 9-11 studies student-group – keep up your courageous, heroic efforts to find the truth. There are plenty of true patriots with you and our numbers are growing and our traction gets stronger every day.

The rest of you – WAKE-UP!!! And help them!!! We’re losing our country!!!

This article demonstrates primarily, alas, a baffling ignorance by the editors who let it through. I just publicly challenged them (http://www.global-platonic-theater.com/Censors,%20Handling/Challenging%20on%20Baby%20Step/uwec%20spectator.htm) to refute the elementary conspiracy class of http://www.911babystep.com.

Love,