The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

Spectator editorial: Wage war

A panel of business and labor leaders recommended March 1 that the minimum wage should be raised in Wisconsin, according to an article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The minimum wage now is $5.15. That wage would be raised 55 cents to $5.70 an hour in October, and would be raised to $6.50 an hour in October 2005. The plan also would include a special teen rate that would pay teenagers $5.30 an hour in October and $5.90 in October 2005.

The raise would be an excellent change for workers. Anyone who has read “Nickel and Dimed,” by Barbara Ehrenreich, knows minimum wage is not a living wage. The increase will help workers more than it will hurt employers.

Story continues below advertisement

The Issue
Business and labor leaders have suggested a higher
minimum wage, though teenagers would not receive the full amount.

This proposed wage raise hopefully will lead to increased spending by low-wage workers and offset financial squeezes some businesses may face. The raise is gradual, and businesses should have time to adjust.

When one or two parents are struggling to get by on a minimum wage salary, every little bit helps. Gov. Jim Doyle’s office estimated that 130,000 to 160,000 workers would be affected by the raise, according to the article.

It’s a step in the right direction for adult workers.

The special teen rate, however, is not a good addition. While teenagers generally work for experience or to pay car insurance and do not usually have the financial obligations many adults do, they are still doing adult work. It would be like paying a 65-year-old less because he or she receives a Social Security check.

Employers also might be more likely to hire a staff consisting of cheap teenagers rather than equally qualified or available adults who need jobs to support themselves and their families.

But even with its problems, the proposal is a good start toward solving some working class economic troubles.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

The Spectator intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. The Spectator does not allow anonymous comments and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Spectator Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activate Search
Spectator editorial: Wage war