The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.

The Spectator

Spectator editorial: Davies decisions

Davies Center is a unique building on campus. As the campus’ student union, it is the only building paid for through student segregated fees.

The building, built in 1959, is showing signs of its age. In comparison to many other UW System schools, our student union is a disgrace and an embarrassment.

The issue
Student Senate voted to allow three university governing bodies to decide the fate of Davies Center.

Efforts have been made in the past to try to fix and update the center, such as the recent remodeling work. In 2003, aÿreferendum was held, which asked student to approve a new, $36.1 million center. With the highest voter turnout in 28 years, students voted 4-to-1 not to add the center.

On Oct. 10, a majority of Student Senators voted to place the future of Davies Center into the hands of three university governing bodies: Student Senate, United Hall Council and the University Centers and Programs Advisory Committee.

Story continues below advertisement

However, they voted to keep the most important group of people out of the final decision-making process – the students.

While student votes were the roadblock that kept the new center from being approved in 2003, it doesn’t make our individual voices any less important. It’s likely that many student voters were turned off by the price tag of the center, something that was not fully explained to them.

It’s Student Senate’s and the university’s job to explain and to sell students on changes that will be in their best interest.

To treat the student body like unreasonable roadblocks to this process is insulting.ÿIf the process is explained fully to students, it’s likely they will approve it.

But this means the university and, more specifically, Student Senate would have to spend time through advertising campaigns, forums and listening sessions to get students on board.

The approved method of gathering student input through an Internet survey is likely to be ineffective and is impersonal.

Senators must take the time to meet with students individually to really hear their opinions on this important issue.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

The Spectator intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. The Spectator does not allow anonymous comments and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Spectator Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activate Search
Spectator editorial: Davies decisions