The Spectator

Wisconsin vs. Minnesota: State flags

Sarah Bradford and Corbin B. Cousky

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Wisconsin

The long-established saying goes “age before beauty” and in the Wisconsin-Minnesota flag debate, this holds true. Wisconsin was a state 10 years before Minnesota, which gives our flag a more mature and practical flavor. I’m not saying that the Wisconsin flag is less attractive; let me explain. At first glance our flag may appear to be less artistic, but it is overall more innovative. Instead of loading all of the state symbols into one huge metaphorical landscape, the flag shows our history in a straight-up, tell-it-like-it-is Wisconsin style. There’s no messing around. Everyone can tell how the great Badger state has contributed to the nation through its chief industries of navigation, mining, agriculture and manufacturing without any flowery explanation. Oh, and we have a bigger font. Whatcha gonna do, Minnesota? -SB

Minnesota

So, needless to say, most state flags are pretty lame. Minnesota’s flag certainly isn’t groundbreaking or really that original, but man it’s classy. It also proves a lot.

First, it proves us Minnesotans are pretty proficient at math. The 19 stars in the seal represent that Minnesota is the 19th state since the original 13 colonies. We had to either add or subtract to get to that one.

Next, our flag proves that Minnesota knows its history. The flag has three dates: 1819 – which was when Fort Snelling was established – 1858 – when we became a state and 1893 – when the flag was made official.

Our flag certainly didn’t take much creativity, but it holds a lot in it. And if nothing else, it proves we can arrange 19 stars and not make it look awkward, which is harder than it sounds. – CBC

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Leave a Comment

The Spectator intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Spectator does not allow anonymous comments and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




The official student newspaper of University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire since 1923.
Wisconsin vs. Minnesota: State flags