Quantcast The Spectator
College Media Network
Spectator Home Spectwitter! Specbook! Site map

Proposed bill aims to keep grads in state

Abstract:
Wisconsin lawmakers are honing in on student loans as a means to keep students in the state after graduation....

  • Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

C

posted 1/28/08 @ 8:12 AM CST

Maybe it depends on how much of a student loan bill they rack up. I'm an actual E.C. graduate and I wish I would have left the state after graduation. Wisconsin just does not have much to offer outside of insurance, health care and education. Wisconsin however is kind of funny, they don't seem to care much for fresh blood. They want to hire friends and family, nepotism runs deep here, and this proposal only enforces that way of thinking. The bill even reeks of a fascist tendency, by creating an incentive to keep graduates in Wisconsin, thus limiting a natural tendency of American life - freedom.

Scott Gunem

posted 1/28/08 @ 7:50 PM CST

I think Rep. Smith's bill is well-intentioned, and I agree that it's very important for Wisconsin to retain more of its young people. However, like C, I don't think it's in anyone's interest to restrict freedom. We could erect a border along the state-line to keep young people here, but this would be too expensive. ;-)

I suspect that C is onto something when he brings up nepotism. It does seem to be a problem here. The most qualified candidate is often passed over for a less-qualified person with the right connections. Yes, this happens other places, too. However, it seems more pronounced in Wisconsin, particularly northern Wisconsin. Yes? No? Maybe?

rprp

posted 1/29/08 @ 9:31 AM CST

The only way any one can become rich in this state is to become a farmer. Most graduates don't want to be farmers.

Scott Gunem

posted 1/29/08 @ 10:34 AM CST

Hey, those students at Moo U (UWRF) all want to become farmers! Just joking. In all seriousness, farming is a noble profession; but I don't think the vast majority of farmers in Wisconsin would consider themselves rich. But one can lead a satisfying, purposeful life without necessarily becoming wealthy, right? Wrong?
  • Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Should the UW-Eau Claire campus go smoke-free?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement